Coventry Archives
Photograph no.7 m.e.:-
Question:- Dead easipeasi Blog. Why is the
above appropriate for what is below?
Dear Blog,
I thought that you would like to
know that I can see clearly now, the rain had gone last Friday morning and there were no obstacles in the way as I had
an appointment at the opticians, BOOTS in Coventry City Centre. I caught the
local bus into town, the dark clouds had gone and it turned out to be a bright,
bright, sunshiny day. I got my spectackles and as I was in town I popped into
the City Archives to check on a bit of a problem I am having with a club
photograph from 1914. The scene depicted in the photograph was of a group of
runners lounging about on the grass in front of a marquee on a bright, bright
sunshiny day in April. No dark clouds to spoil the view, I suspected the
photograph was taken at the Demon Cycling Club Sports but I wanted to confirm
that fact.....
In the Archives I checked with the 'Graphic', usually
a good source to check for photographs from that era ... Nothing. No pickies,
no report. No mention of the sports.
I checked with
the 'Coventry Times', ... Nothing. No
pickies, no report. No mention of the sports
I checked with the 'Herald',... Nothing. No pickies,
no report. No mention of the sports
I checked with the 'Midland Daily Telegraphic',...
Nothing. No pickies, no report. No mention of the sports.
I have moaned to you before Blog, Have I not???? Many
times ... many many times!! Well I may have mentioned it before but I am going
to mention it again. Now there is a surprise for you (Yawn).
One of the legacies of the Millennium, thanks to funds
for the National Lottery, each town and city archive around the country was
given very many copies of theirown local paper(s). Not all newspaper titles
mind you, just a couple. I assume no locals were canvassed as to which
newspaper was preferred for copying????? Here in Coventry, The Times, The Graphic
and the Herald, and later the Midland Daily Telegraph. One of the first, if not
the very first local sports paper to be published never made the
Newspaper Archive blokes at the National Archive Copying Centre. Cries of
'Shame' off stage right??
But what was copied would be GREAT for local historians
you might think, Blog. GREAT for a
record of the city you might think, Blog. GREAT
for a reference resource you might think, Blog?
Well Bloggsie Boy you would be wrong on three counts
as far as my interests are concerned.
Count number uno:- The Newspaper Archive blokes at the
National Archive Copying Centre couldn't be arsed to check what the quality of
the copying was .... resulting in the newspaper column next to the fold on each
page being unreadable because the page was not flattened before it was copied
and it appears on fiche distorted. So that was a good investment, wasn't it!!!?
Count number duoes:- The Newspaper Archive blokes at
the National Archive Copying centre couldn't be arsed to check what the quality
of the copying was ....resulting in very, very many pages being so faded that
they are totally unreadable. So that was a good investment, wasn't it!!!!!??
Count number tresses:- The Newspaper Archive blokes at
the National Archive Copying centre couldn't be arsed to check what they were
copying. All around the country, on a Saturday night, the local papers printed
a sport edition, usually in a different colour. These were known affectionately
by the punters as 'the green'un', or the 'pink'un' or the 'blue'un', depending
on the local chosen shade of paper. The editors quite naturally understood that
the sports readership would pick up their special edition to follow their sport
/ team / general sporty interest. Understandable. Come the Monday edition, the
editors again quite logically understood that the sports readership had picked
up their special edition on Saturday to follow their sport / team / general
sporty interest. So the editor would see no point in repeating ALL the sports content of the
Saturday special edition, 'the green'un', or the 'pink'un', or the 'blue'un' depending
on the local chosen shade of paper. So far so good ... all nice and logical and
what any sane reader would expect. BUT
:- here we are dealing with the Newspaper Archive blokes at the National Archive
Copying centre who couldn't be arsed to check the logic of what they were
copying .... "why copy a special sports edition" ... Why indeed??????
Admittedly some copies did sneak through, but as Paul would have said 'Not a
lot'!!
So sports minded researchers of local sports results
like me have buggerall to refer to. Yes, results do appear in some specialist
sports magazines but not in that much depth, it has to be said. Understandable.
So that was a good investment by the Millennium grandees, wasn't it!!!!!??
Luckily we now have the National Newpaper Archives
putting local newspapers on line. Fantasticmossa. No more trailing into the
city using my old age pensioner's bus pass!! You would think that was a
brilliantty idea, wouldn't you Blog??
Well Bloggsie Boy you would be wrong on three counts.
Count number uno:- The Newspaper Archive blokes at the
National Archive Copying Centre couldn't be arsed to check what the quality of
the copying was .... resulting in the newspaper column next to the fold on each
page being unreadable because the page was not flattened before it was copied
and it appears on line distorted. So that was a good investment, wasn't it!!!?
Count number duoes:- The Newspaper Archive blokes at
the National Archive Copying centre couldn't be arsed to check what the quality
of the copying was ....resulting in very, very many pages being so faded that
they are totally unreadable. So that was a good investment, wasn't it!!!!!??
Count number tresses:- The Newspaper Archive blokes at
the National Archive Copying centre couldn't be arsed to check what they were
copying. All around the country, on a Saturday night, the local papers printed
a sport edition, usually in a different colour. These were known affectionately
by the punters as 'the green'un', or the 'pink'un' or the 'blue'un', depending
on the local chosen shade of paper. The editors quite naturally understood that
the sports readership would pick up their special edition to follow their sport
/ team / general sporty interest. Understandable. Come the Monday edition, the
editors again quite logically understood that the sports readership had picked
up their special edition on Saturday to follow their sport / team / general
sporty interest. So the editor would see no point in repeating ALL the sports content of the
Saturday special edition, 'the green'un', or the 'pink'un' or the ;blue'un',
depending on the local chosen shade of paper. So far so good ... all nice and
logical and what any sane reader would expect. BUT :- here we are dealing with the Newspaper Archive blokes
at the National Archive Copying centre who couldn't be arsed to check the logic
of what they were copying .... "why copy a special sports edition"
... Why indeed?????? Admittedly some copies did sneak through, but as Paul
would have said 'Not a lot'!!
So sports minded researchers of local sports results
like me have buggerall to refer to. Yes, results do appear in some specialist
sports magazines but not in that much depth, it has to be said. Understandable.
So that was a good investment, wasn't it!!!!!?? ACTUALLY IT WAS AS I ONLY USE
THE NATIONAL NEWSPAPER ON LINE ARCHIVE WHEN I HAVE A SPECIAL MONTH'S OFFER OF A
QUID. Otherwise it is back on the local bus into the city using my old age
pensioner's bus pass to use the computers at the local Coventry Archives.
BUT ... BUT .... BUT... Blog, I have a big problem ..... I sit there
for hours trying to decide whether to use the local micro fiche reels on the
micro fiche machine facilities to do research, or do I use their computer to
use the National Newspaper files to do my research ..... I am buggered if I do
and I am buggered if I do, because of three counts ..... I have a feeling of
déjà vu coming on Blog ......
............... the bad feelings have appeared, and
the dark clouds have covered the blue skies and it is starting to rain .....
Colin